Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog

Archive for March, 2009

Appealing To The United States Supreme Court

Tuesday, March 31st, 2009

Except in very limited circumstances, the United States Supreme Court only hears appeals from the various federal circuit courts of appeals or the highest court of the several states.

There is no automatic right to review by the Supreme Court.  A party that desires to have their case heard by the Court must file what is called a Petition for a Writ of Certioari.  The Justices decide based on that petition, as well as any brief in opposition thereto filed by an opposing party, whether they will hear the case.  If the Justices grant the Petition for a Writ of Certioari, the parties are directed to file briefs and oral argument may be set.

There is a very strict time limit of ninety (90) days in which a party must file the Petition.  The ninety days start running from the time of the entry of final judgment in the lower court.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Sexting

Thursday, March 26th, 2009

It seems another group of teen-agers have been arrested this week – this time in upstate New York – for the offense of ’sexting’.

‘Sexting’ is the sending of nude photos via cell phone to cell phone messaging, commonly known as ‘texting’. Recently, the term has gained traction as national news organizations have noticed a dramatic uptick in child pornography arrests of teenagers sending pictures of themselves to their boyfriends or girlfriends. The charges have ranged from minor misdemeanors all the way up to felony transportation of sexually explicit child pornography. A recent survey found that twenty percent of teenagers admitted to sending or receiving naked pictures via their cell phones. This is a national epidemic, and what we are seeing is uneven enforcement across the land. Some of these teenage arrestees are facing lifetimes sex offender reporting requirements if convicted or adjudicated delinquent of the offenses they’ve been charged with.

Since criminal law is mostly state law (thankfully, no federal prosecutions or arrests have commenced so far, nor do the feds seem to be interested), it is impossible to expect an even-handed enforcement against sexting. The local prosecutors in every county in America get to make their own decisions about whether to bring charges and, if so, what charges to bring.

Personally, it frightens me that conduct which is so frequent (one in five teens!) is met by such disparate treatment in different jurisdictions – from no charge to serious felony sex charges – but I’m not sure there is any way to prevent this. I’ll keep watching the news to see what develops.

Share/Save/Bookmark

War on Drugs

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009

There are many groups working toward changing our unfair drug laws and the way our government handles the War on Drugs.

There are a number of good organizations out there working to end the draconian penalties of the drug war and the chipping away of our constitutional rights that has resulted. I am a member of the Drug Policy Alliance (www.drugpolicy.org), which is an excellent national organization working to end the war on drugs. Their mission is to promote “new drug policies based on science, compassion, health and human rights and a just society in which the fears, prejudices and punitive prohibitions of today are no more.” You can help by making a charitable donation and joining the group.

Another great organization is Families Against Mandatory Minimums (www.famm.org). They are a national voice for fair sentencing policies, dedicated to educating the public and our elected officials about the dramatic injustices that happen in drug courts every day. First time non-violent offenders are routinely sent to state or federal prison for many years, when few (including the judges) think it morally defensible. Just like the Drug Police Alliance, Families Against Mandatory Minimums is a non-profit, charitable organization.

Check out their websites to make charitable donations or join as members. These folks do important work and can use all of our support.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Aggravated Assault Upon Police – A War Story

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009

I was reminded the other day of my very first felony trial, some years back. My client was charged with assaulting a police officer and he decided to waive his right to a jury.

Unbeknownst the District Attorney (but knownst to me), my client’s right hand was paralyzed due to a prior car accident. Now, the police officer in his report stated that my client punched him in the face – that was the assault – and of course my client denied it.

The trial begins. The DA leads the cop through the incident, culminating in the officer testifying that my client had punched him in the face with his right hand! Well, at this point, I was pretty darn excited and couldn’t wait to begin my cross-examination.

Officer, you said my client punched you in the face? -yes

And that was with his right hand? -yes

When you say punch, do you mean a slap, or do you mean a punch? -a punch

So, he made his hand into a fist? -yes, that’s what a punch means, counsel.

Did you actually see his fingers curl into a fist? -yes, yes, that’s what I said

By this time, the officer was getting frustrated with me. Little did he know what was about to happen.

I asked no more questions, the government rested, I called my client.

Show the judge your right hand, I said. When my client complied, I saw confusion cross the judge’s face, her eyebrows knotted, and she cocked her head to say: “it looks like he doesn’t have knuckles!”

Why does it look like you don’t have knuckles, I asked.

Well, my client said, my hand has been paralyzed for ten years. I can’t make a fist or move it in any way, so the lines that normal people have on their knuckles, I just don’t have ‘em.

Mr. Hochberg, said the judge, do you have any medical proof of this?

Why yes, Your Honor. Here are five hundred pages of medical records.

Not Guilty.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Copyright © 2010 Levin & Zeiger, LLP. All rights reserved. Review our disclaimer.
Website by Legal Internet Solutions Incorporated.
Levin & Zeiger, LLP, 123 South Broad Street, Suite 1200, Philadelphia, PA 19109 v: 215.825.5183 f:215.279.8702