Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Lambert v. Beard, No. 07-9005

Friday, February 11th, 2011

After 28 years of litigation, this case may be over.

At a bar in Philadelphia, two people were killed. Lambert was prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced to death. The main testimony for his conviction was from a man who was impeached four different ways. Turns out, there was a fifth way to impeach him–that another man was with him, not Lambert. This information was contained in the police activity report.

The police activity report was never given to Lambert’s lawyers.

On appeal for the last 28 years, court after court denied Lambert’s appeal. Finally, on February 7, 2011, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals had the courage to do the right thing and reverse the conviction and order a retrial based on a simple Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) analysis. Restating for the umpteenth time that the district attorney has to give the defense attorney all of the discovery before the trial.

This is the link for the opinion for Lambert v. Beard.

share save 171 16 Lambert v. Beard, No. 07 9005

Technorati

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

EZX5DB756S2F

share save 171 16 Technorati

Defensive Weapons In Pennsylvania

Sunday, October 25th, 2009

In Pennsylvania, you can carry a weapon for defensive purposes, but you cannot carry every type of defensive weapon even if your intent in carrying it is solely for defensive purposes. Also, if some is injured as a result of your actions, you could be prosecuted not just for the weapon, but also for assault.

Some weapons in Pennsylvania are called Prohibited Offensive Weapons, and if the weapon you possess meets any of the definitions below, you cannot carry the weapon even for defensive purposes. Further, note in the definitional section below the of the actual offensive weapons, that a blackjack and a spring loaded weapon are both mentioned. Many defensive weapons fit a combination of these two and are therefore not allow.

The following picture is an example of a spring loaded baton, and the statute follows.

21 asp baton 300x210 Defensive Weapons In Pennsylvania

Spring Loaded Baton

A POW is defined below:

§ 908. Prohibited offensive weapons

(a) OFFENSE DEFINED.– A person commits a misdemeanor of the first degree if, except as authorized by law, he makes repairs, sells, or otherwise deals in, uses, or possesses any offensive weapon.

(b) EXCEPTIONS.–

(1) It is a defense under this section for the defendant to prove by a
preponderance of evidence that he possessed or dealt with the weapon
solely as a curio or in a dramatic performance, or that, with the
exception of a bomb, grenade or incendiary device, he complied with the
National Firearms Act (26 U.S.C. § 5801 et seq.), or that he possessed
it briefly in consequence of having found it or taken it from an
aggressor, or under circumstances similarly negativing any intent or
likelihood that the weapon would be used unlawfully.

(2) This section does not apply to police forensic firearms experts or
police forensic firearms laboratories. Also exempt from this section
are forensic firearms experts or forensic firearms laboratories
operating in the ordinary course of business and engaged in lawful
operation who notify in writing, on an annual basis, the chief or head
of any police force or police department of a city, and, elsewhere, the
sheriff of a county in which they are located, of the possession, type
and use of offensive weapons.

(3) This section shall not apply to any person who makes, repairs,
sells or otherwise deals in, uses or possesses any firearm for purposes
not prohibited by the laws of this Commonwealth.

(c) DEFINITIONS.– As used in this section, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings given to them in this subsection:

“Firearm.” Any weapon which is designed to or may readily be converted to expel any projectile by the action of an explosive or the frame or receiver of any such weapon.

“Offensive weapons.” Any bomb, grenade, machine gun, sawed-off shotgun with a barrel less than 18 inches, firearm specially made or specially adapted for concealment or silent discharge, any blackjack, sandbag, metal knuckles, dagger, knife, razor or cutting instrument, the blade of which is exposed in an automatic way by switch, push-button, spring mechanism, or otherwise, any stun gun, stun baton, taser or other electronic or electric weapon or other implement for the infliction of serious bodily injury which serves no common lawful purpose.

(d) EXEMPTIONS.– The use and possession of blackjacks by the following persons in the course of their duties are exempt from this section:

(1) Police officers, as defined by and who meet the requirements of the
act of June 18, 1974 (P.L. 359, No. 120), referred to as the Municipal
Police Education and Training Law.

(2) Police officers of first class cities who have successfully
completed training which is substantially equivalent to the program
under the Municipal Police Education and Training Law.

(3) Pennsylvania State Police officers.

(4) Sheriffs and deputy sheriffs of the various counties who have
satisfactorily met the requirements of the Municipal Police Education
and Training Law.

(5) Police officers employed by the Commonwealth who have
satisfactorily met the requirements of the Municipal Police Education
and Training Law.

(6) Deputy sheriffs with adequate training as determined by the
Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency.

(7) Liquor Control Board agents who have satisfactorily met the
requirements of the Municipal Police Education and Training Law.

share save 171 16 Defensive Weapons In Pennsylvania

Citizen’s Arrest

Friday, June 5th, 2009

We were contacted by CBS 3 to give our opinion about citizen’s arrests. See below for the video:

share save 171 16 Citizens Arrest

Sexting

Thursday, March 26th, 2009

It seems another group of teen-agers have been arrested this week – this time in upstate New York – for the offense of ‘sexting’.

‘Sexting’ is the sending of nude photos via cell phone to cell phone messaging, commonly known as ‘texting’. Recently, the term has gained traction as national news organizations have noticed a dramatic uptick in child pornography arrests of teenagers sending pictures of themselves to their boyfriends or girlfriends. The charges have ranged from minor misdemeanors all the way up to felony transportation of sexually explicit child pornography. A recent survey found that twenty percent of teenagers admitted to sending or receiving naked pictures via their cell phones. This is a national epidemic, and what we are seeing is uneven enforcement across the land. Some of these teenage arrestees are facing lifetimes sex offender reporting requirements if convicted or adjudicated delinquent of the offenses they’ve been charged with.

Since criminal law is mostly state law (thankfully, no federal prosecutions or arrests have commenced so far, nor do the feds seem to be interested), it is impossible to expect an even-handed enforcement against sexting. The local prosecutors in every county in America get to make their own decisions about whether to bring charges and, if so, what charges to bring.

Personally, it frightens me that conduct which is so frequent (one in five teens!) is met by such disparate treatment in different jurisdictions – from no charge to serious felony sex charges – but I’m not sure there is any way to prevent this. I’ll keep watching the news to see what develops.

share save 171 16 Sexting

Aggravated Assault Upon Police – A War Story

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009

I was reminded the other day of my very first felony trial, some years back. My client was charged with assaulting a police officer and he decided to waive his right to a jury.

Unbeknownst the District Attorney (but knownst to me), my client’s right hand was paralyzed due to a prior car accident. Now, the police officer in his report stated that my client punched him in the face – that was the assault – and of course my client denied it.

The trial begins. The DA leads the cop through the incident, culminating in the officer testifying that my client had punched him in the face with his right hand! Well, at this point, I was pretty darn excited and couldn’t wait to begin my cross-examination.

Officer, you said my client punched you in the face? -yes

And that was with his right hand? -yes

When you say punch, do you mean a slap, or do you mean a punch? -a punch

So, he made his hand into a fist? -yes, that’s what a punch means, counsel.

Did you actually see his fingers curl into a fist? -yes, yes, that’s what I said

By this time, the officer was getting frustrated with me. Little did he know what was about to happen.

I asked no more questions, the government rested, I called my client.

Show the judge your right hand, I said. When my client complied, I saw confusion cross the judge’s face, her eyebrows knotted, and she cocked her head to say: “it looks like he doesn’t have knuckles!”

Why does it look like you don’t have knuckles, I asked.

Well, my client said, my hand has been paralyzed for ten years. I can’t make a fist or move it in any way, so the lines that normal people have on their knuckles, I just don’t have ‘em.

Mr. Hochberg, said the judge, do you have any medical proof of this?

Why yes, Your Honor. Here are five hundred pages of medical records.

Not Guilty.

share save 171 16 Aggravated Assault Upon Police   A War Story
Copyright © 2012 Levin & Zeiger, LLP. All rights reserved. Review our disclaimer.
Website by Legal Internet Solutions Incorporated.
The Offices of Levin & Zeiger LLP, 123 S Broad St, Ste 1200, Philadelphia, PA 19107 v: 215.825.5183 f:215.279.8702