 |
|
Posts Tagged ‘summary offense’
Sunday, March 7th, 2010
As we have previously discussed, when you are arrested and you are NOT convicted of any crime and you do NOT plea guilty to any crime, you can have the record of your arrest expunged in Pennsylvania. However, if you are convicted or plea guilty to a summary offense, you can have the conviction of the summary expunged if you wait five years and stay out of trouble during that five you period of time.
An exception exists to the five year waiting period. The exception is directly written into the expungement statute at 18 Pa.C.S. sec. 9122(a)(3) as:
a person 21 years of age or older who has been convicted of a
violation of section 6308 (relating to purchase, consumption,
possession or transportation of liquor or malt or brewed beverages)
petitions the court of common pleas in the county where the conviction
occurred seeking expungement and the person has satisfied all terms and
conditions of the sentence imposed for the violation, including any
suspension of operating privileges imposed pursuant to section 6310.4
(relating to restriction of operating privileges). Upon review of the
petition, the court shall order the expungement of all criminal history
record information and all administrative records of the Department of
Transportation relating to said conviction.
This means that if you are convicted of a summary offense under 18 Pa.C.S. 6308, you are over 21 years old and you have satisfied all of the requirements from the initial sentence, your summary conviction shall be expunged without the five year waiting period. 18 Pa.C.S. 6308 involves summary offenses related to alcohol.
Therefore, your under aged drinking conviction can get expunged in less then five years.
 In Japan its also illegal to purchase alcohol under age. However, you can buy beer from a vending a machine.
Tags: administrative records, alcohol, court of common pleas, criminal history record, summary, summary conviction, summary offense, under aged drinking, waiting period
Posted in expungement, summary offenses, underaged drinking | 7 Comments »
Friday, August 21st, 2009
I have spoken to many people who are confused about why they are charged with a misdemeanor when their only offense is disorderly conduct. The simple answer is the gradation of the offense depends on how disorderly you were. A person is generally guilty of disorderly conduct if “with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he: (1) engages in fighting or threatening, or in violent or tumultuous behavior; (2) makes unreasonable noise; (3) uses obscene language, or makes an obscene gesture; or (4)creates a hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act which serves no legitimate purpose of the actor.”
The gradation for the above described activity is as follows “An offense under this section is a misdemeanor of the third degree if the intent of the actor is to cause substaintial harm or serious inconvenience, or if he persists in disorderly conduct after reasonble warning or request to desist. Otherwise disorderly conduct is a summary offense.“
In my experience people are almost always charged with disorderly conduct as a summary. The times where I see the commonwealth pursue the misdemeanor is when the defendant’s behavior is extraordinary or where it is done in a highly populated public area. It is difficult to cause substantial harm or serious inconvenience when you are by yourself or with only a small group of people. I hope this helps clear up some of the confusion.
Tags: disorderly conduct, summary, summary offense
Posted in summary offenses | 8 Comments »
Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009
A distinguished lawyer call our office this morning to discuss a previous post on summary offenses, where the reader could interpret our post to mean that summary offenses are not crimes. He stated that under Commonwealth v. Matty, 619 A.2d 1383 (Pa. Super. 1993), certain summary offenses are in fact crimes because if you face jail time in a case, it is a criminal case.
First, summary offenses are broken into two categories, traffic offenses and non-traffic offenses. Certain traffic offenses are not criminal offenses, but can carry jail time. Therefore, I respectfully disagree with my colleage that if you are looking at jail time, the case that puts you in jail must be a crime.
Further, in Matty, the issue is whether a conviction for a summary conviction can stand when a crime was charged to the jury. The issue in the case is NOT whether a summary offense is a crime. Clearly, 18 Pa.C.S.A. sec. 106, defines all gradations of crimes and summaries are not listed. Therefore a summary offense is not a crime technically. Therefore, I respectfully disagree with my colleague regarding the syntax of the case and the PA Code.
However, summary offenses are reported to the Pennsylvani State Police and they pop-up on record checks (traffic offenses do not appear on criminal record checks). Regardless of how one reads the Matty case or sec. 106, if you are convicted of a Summary Offense, you may face jail time and the Summary Offense will come up in a crminal record check.
A Summary Offense is expungeable and a Summary Offense is reported on a criminal record check. This debate about whether a Summary Offense is a criminal offense is of no moment. The real issue is whether a Summary conviction can effect your life and liberty? The answer is clearly: yes.
Tags: criminal offenses, criminal record checks, disorderly conduct, expungement, harassment, state police, summary, summary conviction, summary offense, traffic offenses
Posted in summary offenses | 17 Comments »
Thursday, January 22nd, 2009
Summary Offenses in Pennsylvania range from disorderly conduct to speeding tickets. Summary offenses are broken down into two categories, traffic and non traffic offenses. Non traffic summary offenses DO appear in criminal record history checks even though summary offenses are actually not criminal convictions like misdemeanors and felonies. Summary offenses are often reviewed by potential employers and should be taken seriously even though they are not criminal convictions.
Some of the most common summary offenses we see are disorderly conduct, public drunkenness, retail theft, and harassment. Often times when the police don’t really have any real crime to charge , but they want to assert their power against you, they use a summary offense as a guise to make a lawful arrest and say that your conduct was unlawful.
For example, I have had many cases where clients tell me that they observed the police making a bad arrest or physically inflicting harm against someone they were trying to arrest and my client started yelling at the officer about the way they were treating the other human being, or they were capturing the treatment on video from their cell phone. Another officer approaches my client and arrests them for disorderly conduct, and magically, their phone disappears.
Summary offenses are expungeable in Pennsylvania, even if convicted. If five years pass with no other incidents with the law, you may apply for an expungement with the Court of Common Pleas, and there will be a full hearing as to whether the summary conviction with be expunged. Unlike and ARD (Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition), there is no automatic right to expungement–you must win the hearing.
Tags: accelerated rehabilitative disposition, ard, criminal record, disorderly conduct, expungeable, expungement, felony, harassment, misdemeanor, public drunkeness, public drunkenness, retail theft, summary, summary offense, summary offenses, traffic offenses
Posted in summary offenses | 2 Comments »
|
|
|
|
|
