Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog

Archive for the ‘Drug Possession Delivery and Distribution’ Category

Marijuana: Maximum Penalities

Monday, August 17th, 2009

In Pennsylvania, if you are convicted of Possession with the Intent to Deliver (PWID) Marijuana, you could frace a mandatory minimum. The mandatories are as follows:

2 lbs. to < 10 lbs. or 10 to < 21 live plants: 1st conviction 1 year, subsequent – 2 years

10 lbs. to < 50 lbs. or 21 to 51 live plants: 1st conviction 3 years, subsequent – 4 years

50 lbs. or more or 51 live plants or more: 1st conviction 5 years subsequent – 5 years

The key to the sentencing issue above is that the defendant must be convicted of PWID. If you are not convcted of PWID, the mandatories do not apply and you are sentenced based on the sentencing guidelines. There are four basic ways to be convicted of PWID for any drug. First, selling the drugs. Second, conspiring with other to sell drugs. Third, possessing a quantity too great to reasonably be able to use the drugs just for yourself. Fourth, sharing the drugs in a social setting.

Also, there are exceptions to the mandatory rules where you can file a motion and argue that even though you possessed some of the drugs for delivery, you possessed some for personal use and therefore the mandatory should not apply.

Share/Save/Bookmark

War on Drugs

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009

There are many groups working toward changing our unfair drug laws and the way our government handles the War on Drugs.

There are a number of good organizations out there working to end the draconian penalties of the drug war and the chipping away of our constitutional rights that has resulted. I am a member of the Drug Policy Alliance (www.drugpolicy.org), which is an excellent national organization working to end the war on drugs. Their mission is to promote “new drug policies based on science, compassion, health and human rights and a just society in which the fears, prejudices and punitive prohibitions of today are no more.” You can help by making a charitable donation and joining the group.

Another great organization is Families Against Mandatory Minimums (www.famm.org). They are a national voice for fair sentencing policies, dedicated to educating the public and our elected officials about the dramatic injustices that happen in drug courts every day. First time non-violent offenders are routinely sent to state or federal prison for many years, when few (including the judges) think it morally defensible. Just like the Drug Police Alliance, Families Against Mandatory Minimums is a non-profit, charitable organization.

Check out their websites to make charitable donations or join as members. These folks do important work and can use all of our support.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Possession with the Intent to Deliver (PWID) – Five Card Bud

Friday, January 23rd, 2009

Possession with the Intent to Deliver (PWID) – Five Card Bud

Possession with the Intent To Deliver (PWID) is defined three ways in Pennsylvania: 1. Selling; 2. Sharing; 3. Quanity.

Selling narcotics is obvious, possesion with the intent to deliver in that you hold narcotics that you intend not to use, but to deliver to other people. The packaging of the narcotics is not necessarily relvant if the sale is observed. Be it marijuana, cocaine, pcp, heroin, or methamphetamine, this type of PWID is easy to understand.

Sharing narcotics is a bit more tricky because people in the general public think of PWID as drug dealing, so when someone goes to a party and brings a enough marijuana or cocaine for the whole party, they are not a drug dealer, just a generous party goer. However, this too meets the plain language definition of Possession with the Intent to Deliver because the person possessed the narcotics and delivered them to other people.

If the video excerpt from above occurred in Pennsylvania, my opinion is that it would fall within the guise of sharing narcotics. While the individual, was not attempting to get paid for selling weed, he was delivering it in a social sense at the casino.

The third example of possession with the intent to delvier is the most difficult for people to understand, and that is quantity. The basis for this type is that a reasonable could not personally injest the amount possessed alone, therefore they must possess it with the intent to deliver. This type of PWID is often the most defenseable from my perspective because based on the packaging, the weight, or the circumstance surrounding the arrest, the quantity can often be explained away in a very reasonable manner that is quite convincing to the trier of fact.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Copyright © 2010 Levin & Zeiger, LLP. All rights reserved. Review our disclaimer.
Website by Legal Internet Solutions Incorporated.
Levin & Zeiger, LLP, 123 South Broad Street, Suite 1200, Philadelphia, PA 19109 v: 215.825.5183 f:215.279.8702